What is the difference between the inherent & delegated powers of the president

Delegated powers come from laws passed by Congress. These powers let the president carry out specific tasks. For example, Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal programs showed how these powers could grow during tough times.

Inherent powers aren’t listed in the Constitution but are implied. They are used in emergencies and come from the president’s role. These powers have big implications for the Constitution, allowing presidents to act in situations not covered by law.

The main difference is in their source and scope:

  • Source: Delegated powers come from Congress, while inherent powers are based on constitutional interpretation.
  • Specificity: Delegated powers are more specific, while inherent powers are broader.
  • Flexibility: Delegated powers can change with new laws, but inherent powers stay the same.

Commander-in-Chief Role

The president has a big role as Commander-in-Chief, leading the military. This power goes beyond just leading; it includes making key defense decisions that affect the world. The president can use military force to defend against invasions, with laws backing this up.

Diplomatic Powers and Treaty Making

The president has a lot of power in foreign policy, but it’s often debated. They can make treaties, but the Senate must approve them. The debate over these powers started early, with Alexander Hamilton and James Madison arguing in 1793.

This debate between Hamiltonian and Madisonian views still affects foreign policy today.

Domestic Policy Implementation

The president’s role in domestic policy has grown a lot. They can enforce laws, propose bills, and issue executive orders. This growth shows how the federal government plays a bigger role in our lives.

However, there’s still debate about balancing the president’s actions and the lawmaking process.

Leave a Comment